The dilemmas of equipoiseThe Australian Centre for Evaluation (ACE) recently published Randomised trials in Australian public policy: a review. It’s an interesting…Apr 5A response icon2Apr 5A response icon2
The art of interviewingI quite do a lot of interviews. It’s actually not a task I particularly enjoy, nor something that necessarily comes entirely naturally to…Mar 18A response icon7Mar 18A response icon7
Research meets evaluation; evaluation meets researchAre research and evaluation really that different? And how much does it really matter?Feb 3A response icon1Feb 3A response icon1
Ignorance, uncertainty, and the importance of judgementI’ve read several books by the physicist Carlo Rovelli recently, and they’ve given me the opportunity to reflect on my ignorance. I have no…Jan 9A response icon1Jan 9A response icon1
How to think differently about the value of interventionsWith Florencia GuerzovichNov 17, 2024A response icon26Nov 17, 2024A response icon26
Thinking beyond the best practice myth of “best buys”With Florencia GuerzovichNov 13, 2024A response icon2Nov 13, 2024A response icon2
Repositioning evaluation theory treesI was recently asked by Rosa María Flores Rodríguez for my thoughts on evaluation theory trees. For several years, Flores Rodríguez has…Aug 20, 2024A response icon4Aug 20, 2024A response icon4
Pivot or entropy? The end of the gold standardIn my previous blog, I documented some of the most common critiques of the supposed “gold standard,” Randomised Control Trials (RCTs)…May 25, 2024A response icon1May 25, 2024A response icon1
The fall of IcarusWe often have conversations about research and evaluation methods which depart from the notion that some methods are, a priori, better than…May 17, 2024May 17, 2024